• About Us
    1. Team
    2. Methodology
    3. Privacy Policy
  • Code of Principles
  • Dispute/Correction
  • Project Supporters
  • Contact
ქართული Azərbaycan հայերեն Русский

Factcheck.ge

Check your Fact
  • Elections 2024 - Crisis
  • Persons
  • Verdicts
    • True
    • Mostly True
    • Half True
    • Mostly False
    • False
    • Lie
    • Manipulation
    • Fake News
    • Without verdict
    • Half Flip
    • Full Flop
    • პოზიცია ნაწილობრივ შეცვალა
    • Satire
    • FactCheck Newspaper
  • Regions
  • Fake News
    • Climate Change
    • როგორ არ მოვტყუვდეთ?
  • Topics
    • Economy
    • Justice
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Health Care
  • Politics
    • Ukraine
    • დაპირებები
    • Election 2021
    • Elections 2017
    • 2016 Parliamentary Elections
    • Elections 2014
    • Elections 2013
    • COVID-19
    • COVID Vaccine
    • Fact-Meter TV
Wine Subsidies in Georgia

Wine Subsidies in Georgia

Georgia has been subsidising grape prices since 2008 when Russia imposed a trade ban on Georgian wine.

09/08/2021
FactCheck Newspaper
FactCheck Newspaper
Facebook Linkedin Twitter Print

Georgia has been subsidising grape prices since 2008 when Russia imposed a trade ban on Georgian wine. Since the Russian Federation was at that time the main export market for Georgian wine, the trade ban inflicted huge social and economic damage to the Georgian wine industry. In order to alleviate these damages, there was a need to subsidise grape prices in order to ensure less damage and keep grape farming profitable. In 2008-2012, the grape subsidy programme was miniscule. In particular, it cost GEL 0.15 for the Georgian budget to subsidise one kilogram of Rkatsiteli grapes, GEL 0.25 for one kilogram of Saperavi grapes and GEL 1 for one kilogram of Mujuretuli/Aleksandrouli grapes. In those years, GEL 6-7 million was allocated from the budget for the annual vintage. 

The situation has changed since 2013 when a GEL 1 subsidy allocated for Mujuretuli/Aleksandrouli grapes remained the same but subsidies for Rkatsiteli and Saperavi grapes increased to GEL 0.4 and 0.35, respectively, with the arrival of the new government. Total budget allocations increased fivefold and reached GEL 32 million in 2013.

The subsidy structure was altered drastically in 2017, implying the government ceased subsidising grape prices, although allocated money to state-owned companies to purchase excess grapes on the market. State-owned companies, Harvest Management Company LLC and JSC Sakura, purchased grapes left unsold on the market and produced wine materials and spirits which would be sold on auction and at wholesale prices. 

In 2008-2017, a total of GEL 165.8 million was allocated from the budget for grape price subsidies. In 2018-2019, the government did not subsidise grape prices, although allocated GEL 10 million to the state-owned Akura enterprise in both years which was, in fact, an indirect subsidy vis-à-vis the vintage. 

In 2020, given the coronavirus pandemic, the Government of Georgia again decided to subsidise grape prices.  GEL 40 million was allocated from the state budget to this end. 

Graph 1:  Budget Allocations for Vintage Subsidies in 2008-2021

Source:  National Wine Agency of Georgia

Naturally, when budget allocations are increased massively, it is important to measure the efficiency of such subsidies and how fairly this money is spent. Since 2017, when the subsidy mechanism was altered, the government started to produce wine materials or spirits from the grape it purchased for sale on auction and at wholesale prices. To better illustrate this process, it is important to take a look at 18 May 2021 where 72 auctions were held to sell wine and spirits.  Given the fact that the wines were sold not at wholesale prices but at a price which was cheaper than the unit cost, some questions were raised. For instance, the market price for Aleksandrouli/Mujuretuli grapes in 2019-2020 was GEL 7 whilst the government was selling one litre of wine produced from this grape for GEL 12.43 and Khvanchkara wine, produced from the same grape varieties albeit with a different technology, was sold for GEL 13.75. Given the fact that two kilograms of grapes are needed to produce one litre of wine, the auction prices are lower as compared to the unit cost.  

Table 1:  Wines Offered at the 18 May 2021 Auction

Source:  Business Media 

Of additional interest is that despite 72 auctions, only a small part of the wine was actually sold. Furthermore, prices were very low and the wines were divided into smaller parts which should have sparked greater interest, although this did not happen. In addition, there are many questions vis-à-vis the quality of the wine since it is unknown how the quality was evaluated and if the procedures for evaluation were in line with standards.

In sum, given the aforementioned facts, wine subsidies are inefficient. Despite vast sums of money spent over the years, the situation is deplorable in terms of efficiency if we take a look at the results of the 18 May 2021 auctions.

Author - Zurab Maisashvili

Category:  Economy

Tags:
ყურძნის სუბსიდირება
ბათუმი
9 წელი
სოფლის მეურნეობა
ეკონომიკა
ყურძნის სუბსიდირება
Zurab Maisashvili
Zurab Maisashvili

All Articles

  • “The profits of Georgian banks increased 23-fold in 2012-2024, rising from GEL 134 million to GEL 3.1 billion. Return on capital ranged between 30% and 40%.”

    “The profits of Georgian banks increased...

    Without verdict
    The verification of the application can not be evaluated
  • Export-Import Trends of Agricultural Products

    Export-Import Trends of Agricultural Pro...

    FactCheck Newspaper
    FactCheck Newspaper
  • : “Emigrants send home USD 3.3 billion annually – about a third of the national budget – this is how the country sustains itself.”

    : “Emigrants send home USD 3.3 billion a...

    Mostly True
    The application is accurate, but requires additional information and/or definition
IFCN Verification
EFCSN
Public Information Base
Factcheck.ge
European GMF Netherland USAID

Phone: +(995 32) 2 22 29 13

Email: [email protected]

Factcheck.ge
Factcheck.ge

The views and opinions expressed on this website belong to Factcheck.ge and are not the views and opinions of project support organizations.

Factcheck.ge

© 2025 | Privacy Policy